Coming from a variety of nations, entities and viewpoints, we as a group of leaders in microfinance have gathered at the Pocantico Conference Center (a facility outside of New York City managed by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund ) at a moment of great opportunity and great risk for the microfinance sector globally: on average, interest rates are declining, efficiency is increasing, provider profits are declining as competition increases; however, indebtedness among clients is also rising, perhaps to unsustainable levels, and the threat of destabilizing state activism is growing. We have come together to seek an honest view of the sector today, especially to explore the differences and similarities among us regarding fundamental purposes and principles. We have enjoyed the opportunity to listen to and learn from one another, and as a result, understand one another better and begin a conversation.
We affirm that microfinance is distinguished by its primary purpose of maximizing long term value to low income clients in a sustainable manner. This can be achieved by the growing diversity of providers and approaches. We affirm our ongoing confidence that microfinance can and should bring increases in income, assets and other benefits to our clients; but we acknowledge that microfinance is not a panacea. We welcome the enlargement of the sector by the entry of new players and investors who share these principles and who work towards maximizing long term value to low income clients.
Looking forward:
- We find
hope in the continued growth of microfinance and the expansion of services
provided to poor and low income people. We are encouraged that in many
areas an increase in competition and the application of new technologies
are bringing down transaction costs leading to lower prices for our
clients. We look forward to the increased provision of savings services
to the poor and the expansion of domestic capital markets. We support
the expanding connections between microfinance, other sectors of the
economy and other development efforts.
- We are concerned
that over-emphasis on the supply side has moved us away from adequately
knowing and understanding our ultimate clients; but we are excited by
the prospect of moving from the provision of microcredit only to adding
additional responsive and responsible products and services.
- We are concerned
by low standards of transparency in the sector and an emphasis on hype;
we support greater transparency particularly at the funder and provider
level—which involves being more honest about costs, performance,
outreach and impact.
- We are concerned
by the rising risk of over indebtedness among clients in many markets.
- We agree
on the need for a code of conduct which should govern how providers
treat their clients, and that microfinance providers should be accountable
for operating according to this code.
- We are pleased
that governments have appreciated the importance of microfinance. We
see important roles for government in creating an appropriate financial
system architecture which works for the poor and low income populations,
although we are concerned about the growing tendency of governments
not to respect the principles of microfinance, and in particular to
become directly involved in the retail provision of credit.
- We are concerned
that extraordinary profits in advance of adequate competition may compromise
client benefit and public support of microfinance. While acknowledging
the role profits play in promoting scale, sustainability and competition,
we also recognize that we hold diverse views about the appropriate levels
and usage of profit. Further, we believe that those who accept public
money should be held to higher standards of accountability for achieving
tangible social benefits with their use of public funds.
- We are committed to fostering a competitive environment and to improvements in operational efficiency which will enable interest rates to come down over time.
These concerns and affirmations have led us to embark on a process which includes the following action steps:
- Defining
key questions on a customer focused research agenda such as understanding
who is and is not served by microfinance, measuring the extent and variety
of impacts due to financial access, investigating how financial services
are used and where the greatest unmet needs lie, and understanding the
extent and nature of over indebtedness among clients.
- Developing
and promoting common principles and standards at various levels among
existing and new actors including funders and financial service providers,
which should address consumer protection, social performance, pricing
transparency, and promotion of financial literacy through client education.
- Investigating
the formation of an international task force which will seek to define
public policies at the national level that are consistent with financial
inclusion while also addressing the potential to reshape the international
financial architecture (such as examining international standards in
areas like capital requirements, payment systems, customer due diligence)
for the benefit of the poor and low income populations.
- Discussing and unpacking further areas of apparent disagreement among industry leaders in a way which includes and respects the range of views in the sector, for example: on the respective roles of consumer finance and microfinance; on the linkage of microfinance to the environment; and on the limits of what microfinance as currently practiced can do and can’t do.
We acknowledge our
responsibility individually, in our institutions and in the industry to
carry these principles, hopes and concerns forward and to implement this
agenda.
Signed:
Fouad Abdelmoumni
Clara Ackerman
Nancy Barry
Renée Chao-Beroff
Shafiq Choudhury
Alex Counts
Carlos Danel
Gabriel Davel
Chris Dunford
Conan French
Mathias Katamba
Doris Koehn
Elizabeth Littlefield
Asad Mahmood
Klaus Mauer
Adrian Merryman
Jonathan Morduch
Nachiket Mor
David Porteous
Lynne Patterson
Larry Reed
Beth Rhyne
Rich Rosenberg
Alex Silva
Gabriel Solórzano
Damian von Stauffenberg
